Moneylife Foundation conducted a workshop on Real Estate titled 'Trends, Issues & Consequences' On 5 May 2010. Click here for more pictures of the event.
Moneylife Foundation conducted a workshop on 'How to be safe and smart with your money', on 20 April 2010. Click here for more pictures of the event.
Noted writer Achyut Godbole chaired a Moneylife Foundation workshop for booklovers on 17 April 2010.
Moneylife Foundation conducts 'Brainstorming seminar on senior citizens issues'(09 April 2010).
Moneylife Foundation conducts financial literacy workshop for women (26 March 2010).
Moneylife Foundation conducted a special financial literacy workshop for women on the occasion of International Women's Day (8 March 2010)
Moneylife Foundation organised an open discussion on "Budget and You" on 27 February 2010. The participants were presented with a detailed analysis of the implications of the Budget proposals.
Sanjay Nirupam, Member of Parliament, inaugurating the Moneylife Knowledge Centre on 6 February 2010.
Moneylife, in association with Reliance Mutual Fund, organised the Big Ideas Essay Contest on “Taking Financial Markets to the Masses,” on 5 December 2009.
The best thing would be that the "Trail" be paid to the "New Distributor". One must look into the fact as to why is the investor changing his Agent. It is a known fact that the employee turover in the big distribution Companies and Banks are high and it so happens that when the employee leaves the local Branch / Company the investors are left high and dry. It is this Big cats that are crying foul on the Trail issue.The trail is not such a big amount where the Agent could pass on benifits to the investors and there are checks in place which can prevent such payouts - The AMC have to be vigilent and not hesitate to cancel the registration of such Agents who are in the game of "passing of incentives"
If somebody invested previously as "DIRECT" investment in Templeton Mutual Fund & now want to introduce a Broker will that new broker eligible for trail? Hope this case is not under any NOC ambiguity.
I have experienced greedy & unethical distr's switch my HNI's entire portfolio to their advatage despite the fact that i had provided excellent services & earned crores for my clients. i strongly feel that if a client is unhappy with his existing distr, he should redeem & open a new pfolio/ a/c. Till that happens, NOC from the previous distr should be a must before the trail comm is switched to such unscruplous new distr.
First of all, if the customer has given a NOC he is clear about the call he is making, (I here assume that 90% of the transfer is happening from National/Regional distributors(ND/RD) to IFA's since the earlier comes to clients only for the new Business or are running a commodity business, hope SEBI is reading this column).
So it's the new Distributor(IFA), who actually takes care of the clients needs (in most of the cases atleast % wise they are much better), but has very little say (with the AMC's SEBI, AMFI) suffers in the whole process - since they serve the client with the expectation that at least they shall get some new business some day which shall get him some income & maybe trail also comes on the transferred assets.
An IFA in the new scenario is either out of business or up's his service with/without a fee, since maybe 5-10% actually charge a fee. Here neither of the 3( AMC's SEBI, AMFI) has taken any effort to train the individual.(However some AMC's have always been proactive on this front).
A check - a Grading system of the servicing standard of the Distributor whether a IFA, ND or RD could be the answer. If at all SEBI is serious about the Investor it has a very important role to play. Atleast to start with the ND & RD, based on the previous record, slowly the IFA can also be included in the process. So that the Investor takes a informed call to start with.
However coming back to our subject, here some of the AMC's maybe adamant for the letter, since which AMC wants to come in the bad books of the National/Regional Distributors, who today bring in the max. business.
Secondly (maybe) some of the AMC's under this guise are pocketing the trail by paying trail to neither.
Mear changing the ARN code with out paying the trail fee is of no use for the new distributor.as no body wants to service the customer with out any benifit .
When the old distributor is not giving good service,why he should continue to get the trail fee?
CHANGE OF DISTRIBUTOR IS THE PRIORITY OF THE CUSTOMER. THE CLIENT WILL CHANGE THE DISTRIBUTOR ONLY IF HE IS NOT SATISFIED WITH THE SERVICES. THE TRAIL COMMISSION SHOULD BE GIVEN TO THE NEW DISTRIBUTOR AS HE IS NOW GOING TO SERVE THE CUSTOMER. TRAIL COMMISSION IS FOR AFTER SALES SERVICE UNLIKE UPFRONT COMMISSION WHICH IS FOR GENERATING SALES. NOC SHOULD NOT BE REQUESTED FROM THE OLD DISTRIBUTOR AS A BAD PROVIDER OF SERVICE CANNOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO PROVIDE THE SERVICES. ONLY NOC FROM THE CUSTOMER SHOULD BE REQUESTED.
Many a times it is being seen that Private Banks and NDs who randomly sell to Retail clients predominantly NFOs do not take ownership of the business sourced. Any IFA who begin servicing those clients are not been rewarded properly if the previous practice of NOC from old distributor prevails neither the clients are ready to pay additionally as service charges for such orphan folios/ investments
Stope the payment of trail commission then you will find the real professional. Now some distributors only target to switch the others AUM and get trail. I reguest regulator to stope trail comission payment.
Those Amcs are demanding noc from old distributors they are ethical and correct.Some distribution house appoint staff for marketing of switch the aum of IFAs.They are only for trail commission purpose.They will not give any services to the investors.It is not good for the mf industries.so every amc should demand for noc .
Change of distributor could be allowed with the consent of investor but trail comission to the new distributor should only be allowed after noc from old distributor.
HNI's and Corporate investors have always taken and continue to take a big bite out of distributor commission. So long as an individual can take money for himself in any transaction, he will. That is why rebating should not have been banned in the first place. The distributor owned amc's are responsible for this.
The best solution seems to me is that distributor change should be done on request of customer without NOC of old distributor but WITHOUT TRAIL FEES,the trail fees should be paid to NEW distributor only in case if customer obtains and submits a ARN stamped NOC from old sitributor.this is simple amicable solution which can serve a middle path for both sides.
Gold loan companies and their murky underbellies If you thought loans against gold were the best thing to happen to mankind since sliced bread, think again. We made trips to various branches of companies which profess to offer
KGN of Pune offers 1% interest a day, except holidays! KGN and its related companies are running what looks like a pyramid scheme through a multi-level marketing chain in Pune under different names, ensnaring gullible small investors
Natural resources funds, unnatural returns Another scheme — the Tata Natural Resources Fund — has entered this space, but there is nothing which this fund can deliver that existing equity funds cannot